Preview

Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Unfortified Settlements of the Cheptsa Culture (9th–13th Centuries): Ambiguity of Interpretation and Delimitation of Boundaries

https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2021.49.1.085-093

Full Text:

Abstract

Unfortified rural settlements have traditionally been detected by the presence of surface finds in tilled soil or of a cultural layer in test pits, by the conformity of the area to known landscape features, and by the absence of salient signs of defensive structures. The totality of these parameters is not always an unambiguous indicator of an unfortified settlement. Owing to intense tillage in the late 20th century, affecting many sites in Central Russia and the western Urals, their outward features have been obliterated, and erosion has resulted in a gradual displacement of habitation deposits from watersheds and slopes to negative landforms. Given these destructions and the resulting unreliability of traditional archaeological criteria, the most efficient way of revealing unfortified settlements, delineating their boundaries, and tentatively reconstructing their layouts, is to use multidisciplinary approach. This study focuses on medieval unfortified settlements in northern Udmurtia—Nizhnebogatyrskoye I, and Kushmanskoye II and III. Their outward features are virtually identical. They were explored using geophysical prospection, soil drilling, and archaeological excavations. On the basis of the results, types of settlement were reliably determined and boundaries of cultural layer were delimited. In all cases, preliminary interpretations were rejected. Kushmanskoye III is shown to be a fortified settlement, and Kushmanskoye II is likely to have been a medieval economic development zone without any structures. In the case of Nizhnebogatyrskoye I, its previously determined boundaries, deduced from the distribution area of finds and landscape features, were substantially corrected.

About the Author

I. V. Zhurbin
Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Laboratory Head

T. Baramzinoy 34, Izhevsk, 426067, Russia



References

1. Arkheologicheskaya karta severnykh raionov Udmurtii. 2004. A.G. Ivanov, M.G. Ivanova, T.I. Ostanina, N.I. Shutova. Izhevsk: UdmIIYAL UrO RAN.

2. Derendyaev D.S. 2016. Otchet ob arkheologicheskikh razvedkakh v Glazovskom raione Udmurtskoi Respubliki v 2016 g. Archives of the UIIYAL UdmFIC UrO RAN. Inv. 2-N, D. 1705.

3. Emelianova A.Y. 2018. Otchet ob arkheologicheskoi razvedke na Nizhnebogatyrskom I poselenii v Glazovskom raione Udmurtskoi Respubliki, provedennoi letom 2018 g. Archives of the UIIYAL UdmFIC UrO RAN. Inv. 2-N, D. 1726.

4. Ivanova M.G. 2016. Otchet ob issledovaniyakh na Kushmanskom gorodishche Uchkakar, Kushmanskom III selishche i Kushmanskom II selishche v Yarskom raione Udmurtskoi Respubliki v 2016 g. Archives of the UIIYAL UdmFIC UrO RAN. Inv. 2-N, D. 1693.

5. Ivanova M.G. 1917. Otchet ob issledovaniyakh na Kushmanskom gorodishche Uchkakar i Kushmanskom III selishche v Yarskom raione Udmurtskoi Respubliki v 2017 g. Archives of the UIIYAL UdmFIC UrO RAN. Inv. 2-N, D. 1707a-v.

6. Ivanova M.G., Kirillov A.N. 2012. Predvaritelnye itogi izucheniya Kushmanskogo kompleksa pamytnikov v basseine r. Cheptsy. In Trudy Kamskoi arkheol.- etnogr. ekspeditsii, iss. 8. Perm: Perm. Gos. Ped. Univ., pp. 313–319.

7. Ivanova M.G., Zhurbin I.V. 2014. Arkheologicheskiye i geofizicheskiye issledovaniya srednevekovykh poseleniy basseina r. Cheptsy. Rossiiskaya arkheologiya, No. 1: 40–53.

8. Kirillov A.N. 2011. Istoriko-kulturnye issledovaniya Potapovskogo mestorozhdeniya v Krasnogorskom raione i razvedochnye raboty na Kushmanskom II i III selishchakh v Yarskom raione Udmurtskoi Respubliki. Archives of the IKMZ UR “Idnakar”. D. 02-03.

9. Kirillov A.N. 2012. Arkheologicheskiye raboty po opredeleniyu granits obyektov arkheologicheskogo naslediya v Glazovskom raione i razvedochnye raboty v Yarskom raione Udmurtskoi Respubliki: Otchet o nauch.-issled. rabote. Archives of the IKMZ UR “Idnakar”. D. 02-03.

10. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya Kushmanskogo gorodishcha Uchkakar IX–XIII vv.: Metodika kompleksnogo analiza. 2018. I.V. Zhurbin, E.E. Antipina, M.G. Ivanova, E.Y. Lebedeva, P.N. Modin, A.Y. Sergeyev, L.V. Yavorskaya. Moscow: Taus.

11. Otchet Udmurtskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii za 1959 g. 1959. Archives of the IA RAN. R-1, D. 1952.

12. Pervukhin N.G. 1896. Opyt arkheologicheskogo issledovaniya Glazovskogo uyezda Vyatskoi gubernii. Moscow: [Tip. M.G. Volchaninova]. (Materialy po arkheologii vostochnykh guberniy Rossii; vol. 2).

13. Spitsyn A.A. 1893. Priuralskiy krai: Arkheologicheskiye rozyskaniya o drevneishikh obitatelyakh Vyatskoi gubernii. Moscow: [Tip. E. Lissnera i Y. Romana]. (Materialy po arkheologii vostochnykh guberniy Rossii; vol. 1).

14. Zhurbin I.V. 2020. A comparative analysis of structural and developmental trends at major Cheptsa fortified sites in the western Urals (Idnakar, Uchkakar, and Guryakar). Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, vol. 48 (1): 120–128.

15. Zhurbin I.V., Borisov A.V., Nazmutdinova A.I., Milich V.N., Petrov R.P., Ivanova M.G., Modin R.N., Knyazeva L.F., Vorobieva N.G., Zinchuk S.V. 2019. The use of remote sensing, geophysical methods and soil analysis in the study of sites disturbed by agricultural activity. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, vol. 47 (2): 103–111.


For citation:


Zhurbin I.V. Unfortified Settlements of the Cheptsa Culture (9th–13th Centuries): Ambiguity of Interpretation and Delimitation of Boundaries. Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2021;49(1):86-93. https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2021.49.1.085-093

Views: 35


ISSN 1563-0110 (Print)