Revisiting the Correlation Between the Valdivia and San Pedro Ceramic Complexes (Based on Technological Characteristics)
A. N. Popov,
J. G. Marcos,
I. S. Zhushchikhovskaya,
A. A. Lazina,
B. V. Lazin,
Y. Kanomata,
A. N. Fedorets,
T. A. Emelyanova https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.2.037-046
Abstract
This article presents the results of a study of ceramics associated with the Valdivia and San Pedro complexes at the Real Alto site, southwestern Ecuador. The test sample, studied in 2022, includes fragments of vessels from two morphological and functional groups, relating to the first two phases of the Valdivia culture (bowls and pots) and those representing the San Pedro complex (vessels with necks and a bowl). A comparative analysis was based on identified technological indicators marking various stages of pottery manufacture. Certain differences are seen in the composition of paste and in the hand-shaping of the vessels. Significant differences were revealed in surface treatment and decoration. This is evidenced by the use of colored and plain coating, high-quality solid or matte striped polishing, and complexity of decoration. Distinctive features of firing include the use of different kilns and various atmospheric modes. Parallels include broadly similar firing temperatures. The technological difference between the two morphological and functional groups of the Valdivia complex is that bowls were manufactured with more complex and labor-consuming techniques, whereas pots are technologically somewhat similar to those from San Pedro. Radiocarbon dates (4640–4450 BP) suggest that the two traditions coexisted. Differences may reflect their cultural distinctness.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 22-28-00059.
About the Authors
A. N. Popov
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Director, Educational and Scientific Museum
Ayaks 10, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922
J. G. Marcos
Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral
Ecuador
Ecuador
Professor
Campus Gustavo Galindo Velasco, Guayaquil, EC-090150, Ecuador
I. S. Zhushchikhovskaya
Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher
Pushkinskaya 89, Vladivostok, 690001
A. A. Lazina
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chief Specialist, Educational and Scientific Museum
Ayaks 10, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922
B. V. Lazin
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Researcher, Educational and Scientific Museum
Ayaks 10, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922
Y. Kanomata
Tohoku University
Japan
Japan
Associate Professor, Graduate School of Arts and Letters
Kawauchi 27-1, Aoba ward, Sendai, 980-8576, Japan
A. N. Fedorets
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer
Ayaks 10, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922
T. A. Emelyanova
Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher
Baltiyskaya 43, Vladivostok, 690041
References
1. Avgustinik A.I. 1956 K voprosu o metodike issledovaniya drevney keramiki. KSIIMK, No. 64: 149–156.
2. Bischof H., Viteri J.G. 1972 Pre-Valdivia occupations on the southwest coast of Ecuador. American Antiquity, vol. 37: 548–551.
3. Bischof H., Viteri J.G. 2006 Entre Vegas y Valdivia: La fase San Pedro en el suroeste del Ecuador. Bulletin de l’Institut Francais d’Etudes Andines, vol. 35 (3): 361–376.
4. Dana K., Sinhamahapatra S., Tripathi H.S., Ghosh A. 2014 Refractories of alumina-silica system. Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society, vol. 73 (1): 1–13.
5. Hall M.L., Mothes P.A. 2008 The rhyolitic-andesitic eruptive history of Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. Bulletin of Volcanology, vol. 70: 675–702.
6. Hayes A., Blom J. 1996 Southwestern Pottery: Anasazi to Zuni. Flagstaff AZ: Northland Publishing Company.
7. Ignat T., Luca A., Dimofte D., Lazăr C., Constantin F., Bugoi R. 2019 Multidisciplinary study on prehistoric pottery from Southeastern Romania. ArcheoSciences, vol. 43 (2): 165–185.
8. Kanomata Y., Marcos J., Popov A., Lazin B., Tabarev A. 2019 New data on early pottery traditions in South America: The San Pedro complex, Ecuador. Antiquity, vol. 93 (369): 1–6.
9. Lathrap D.W., Marcos J.G., Zeidler J.A. 1977 Real Alto: An ancient ceremonial center. Archaeology, vol. 30 (1): 2–13.
10. Maniatis Y. 2009 The emergence of ceramic technology and its evolution as revealed with the use of scientific technologies. In From Mine to Microscopy: Advances in the Study of Ancient Technology. Oxford: Oxford Books Publ., pp. 11–28.
11. Marcos J.G. 1988 Real Alto: La historia de un centro ceremonial Valdivia, vol. 1, 2. Guayaquil-Quito: ESPOL-Corporación Editora Nacional. (Biblioteca Ecuatoriana de Arqueología; vol. 4, 5).
12. Marcos J.G. 2015 Un sitio llamado Real Alto. Quito: Universidad Internacional del Ecuador.
13. Martian L., Mazzoli C., Tentoni M., Leopardi G., Boaro S. 2009 Provenance and production technology of Early Bronze age pottery from a lake-dwelling settlement at Arqua Petrarka, Padova, Italy. In Interpreting Silent Artefacts: Petrographic Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics, P.S. Quinn (ed.). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 81–99.
14. Meggers B., Evans C., Estrada E. 1965 Early Formative Period of Coastal Ecuador: The Valdivia and Machalilla Phases. Washington: Smithsonian Inst. Press. (Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology; vol. 1).
15. Montana G., Polito A.M., Iliopoulos I. 2009 Indigenous tableware production during the archaic period in Western Sicily: New results from petrographic analysis. In Interpreting Silent Artefacts: Petrographic Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics, P.S. Quinn (ed.). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 47–63.
16. Mothes P.A., Hall M.L. 2008 Rhyolitic calderas and centers clustered within the active andesitic belt of Ecuador’s Eastern Cordillera. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 3 (1): 1–5.
17. Palanivel R., Meyvel S. 2010 Microstructural and microanalytical Study – (SEM) of archaeological pottery artifacts. Romanian Journal of Physics, vol. 55 (3/4): 333–341.
18. Pamyatnik Real-Alto i osobennosti rannego formativnogo perioda na poberezhye Ekvadora: Raboty pervoy kompleksnoy rossiysko- ekvadorskoy arkheologicheskoy ekspeditsii v 2014–2015 gg. 2015 D.L. Brodyansky (ed.). Vladivostok: Izd. Dalnevost. Feder. Univ. (Tikhookeanskaya arkheologiya; iss. 34).
19. Pentedeka A., Dimoula A. 2009 Early pottery technology and the formation of a technological tradition: The case of Theopetra cave, Thessaly, Greece. In Interpreting Silent Artefacts: Petrographic Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics, P.S. Quinn (ed.). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 121–138.
20. Quinn P., Burton M. 2009 Ceramic petrography and the reconstruction of hunter- gatherer craft technology in Late Prehistoric Southern California. In Interpreting Silent Artefacts: Petrographic Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics, P.S. Quinn (ed.). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 267–295.
21. Raymond S.J. 1993 Ceremonialism in the Early Formative of Ecuador. Senri Ethnological Studies, vol. 37: 25–43.
22. Rice P.M. 1987 Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
23. Shepard A.O. 1985 Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington: Carnegie Inst. Press.
24. Tabarev A.V. 2016 Formativniy period v arkheologii Ekvadora: Anatomiya termina i voprosy prakticheskogo primeneniya. Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy, No. 1: 110–125.
25. Tabarev A.V., Kanomata Y., Popov A.N., Poshekhonova O.E., Zubova A.V. 2021 Towards the characteristics of Early Formative, Coastal Ecuador: Joint Russian-Japanese-Ecuadorian Excavations at Real Alto Site in 2014–2017. In Valdivia, una Sociedad Neolítica: Nuevos aportes a su conocimiento, M.J. Veriñez (ed.). Manabi: Univesidad Técnica de Manabí, pp. 64–97.
26. Tabarev A.V., Popov A.N., Lazin B.V., Gavrilina T.A. 2018 Pervaya rossiyskaya arkheologicheskaya ekspeditsiya v Yuzhnoy Amerike: Predvaritelniye rezultaty raskopok v Ekvadore v 2014–2015, 2017 gg. Gumanitarniye issledovaniya v Vostochnoy Sibiri i na Dalnem Vostoke, No. 4: 5–13.
27. Thuesen I., Oldenburg E., Iørgensen K. 1989 Microscope section analysis of pottery. Paléorient, vol. 15 (1): 273–278.
28. Tite M.S., Maniatis Y. 1975 Examination of ancient pottery using the scanning electron microscope. Nature, vol. 257: 122–123.
29. Vukovic҅ J. 2018 Late Neolithic Vincͮ a pottery firing procedure: Reconstruction of Neolithic Technology through experiment. Opvscvla Archaeologica, vol. 39: 25–35.
30. Zevallos C., Galinat W., Lathrap D., Leng E., Marcos J., Klumpp K. 1977 The San Pablo corn kernel and its friends. Science, vol. 196 (4288): 385–389.
31. Zhushchikhovskaya I.S. 2017 Opyt primeneniya elektronnoy mikroskopii v izuchenii arkheologicheskoy keramiki yuga Dalnego Vostoka. Zapiski IIMK RAN, iss. 16: 75–91
Review
For citations:
Popov A.N., Marcos J.G., Zhushchikhovskaya I.S., Lazina A.A., Lazin B.V., Kanomata Y., Fedorets A.N., Emelyanova T.A. Revisiting the Correlation Between the Valdivia and San Pedro Ceramic Complexes (Based on Technological Characteristics). Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2024;52(2):37-46. https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.2.037-046
Views:
283
Email this article 