Preview

Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Microstructural Study of Medieval Crucible Steels from Archaeological Sites in Central and Northwest Asia: Identifying the Bulat

https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.3.082-090

Abstract

The microstructure of 9th–15th century artifacts made of crucible steel, found at sites in Central and Northwest Asia, is described. Metallographic study of items from settlements and burials with precise data on chronology, location, and accompanying artifacts is important for reconstructing the history of bulat steel and the technology of melting and processing ultra-high-carbon crucible steel. The study of the macro- and microstructure, and the chemical analysis of such items indicate an extremely high content of carbon—1.7–2.1 %. The characteristic feature of their microstructure is a dark matrix with white inclusions of ledeburite and iron carbides. The combination of structural components is reflected in the patterned structure of the metal. These properties suggest that such metal is identical to bulat steel. Findings of macrostructural analysis extend our knowledge of the varieties of this metal, its structural features, phase composition of separate groups of ultra-high-carbon crucible steel, smelting technology, plastic and thermal treatment, and physical properties.

About the Author

N. M. Zinyakov
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation

Zinyakov N.M. - Professor

Krasnaya 6, Kemerovo, 650000  



References

1. Anosov P.P. 1954 Sobraniye sochineniy. Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR.

2. Arkhangelsky L.B. 2007 Sekrety bulata. Moscow: Metallurgizdat.

3. Biruni Abu Rayhan. 1963 Sobraniye svedeniy dlya poznaniya dragotsennostey: (Mineralogiya). Leningrad: Izd. AN SSSR. (Klassiki nauki).

4. Blanter M.E. 1963 Metallovedeniye i termicheskaya obrabotka. Moscow: Mashgiz.

5. Feuerbach А. 2005 An investigation of the varied technology found in swords, sabres and blades from the Russian Northern Caucasus. Institute of Archaeo-Metallurgical Studies, vol. 25: 27–43.

6. Golikov I.N. 1958 Dendritnaya likvatsiya v stali. Moscow: Metallurgizdat.

7. Gurevich Y.G. 1985 Zagadka bulatnogo uzora. Moscow: Znaniye.

8. Gurevich Y.G. 2005 Bulat – perviy v mire kompozitsionniy material. Vestnik Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Tekhnicheskiye nauki, No. 2: 53–56.

9. Gurevich Y.G. 2006 Bulat: Struktura, svoystva i sekrety izgotovleniya. Kurgan: Izd. Kurgan. Gos. Univ.

10. Gurevich Y.G. 2008 Kolchuga iz arsenala Tamerlana. Cherniye metally, No. 4: 105–107

11. Gurevich Y.G. 2010 Instrument iz indiyskogo vuttsa. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, No. 5 (81): 110–112.

12. Gurevich Y.G., Papakhristu O.A. 1992a Kolchuga Tamerlana. Metallurg, No. 4: 28–30.

13. Gurevich Y.G., Papakhristu O.A. 1992b Proizvodstvo tigelnoy stali v Severnoy Fergane. Metallurg, No. 3: 36–38.

14. Park J.-S., Rajan K., Ramesh R. 2020 High-carbon steel and ancient sword-making as observed in a double-edged sword from an Iron Age megalithic burial in Tamil Nadu, India. Archaeometry, vol. 62 (1): 68–80.

15. Sherby O., Wadsworth J. 1995 Damascus steel and superplasticity. Pt. I: Background, superplasticity, and genuine Damascus steel. Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Journal, vol. 31 (4): 10–17.

16. Sukhanov D.A., Arkhangelsky L.B. 2015 Mikrostruktura bulata. Metallurg, No. 9: 72–75.

17. Sukhanov D.A., Plotnikova N.V., Dolgova S.V., Sukhanova L.N., Golikov A.Y., Arkhangelsky L.B. 2019 Mekhanicheskiye svoystva bulatnoy stali. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovaniye, instrumenty), vol. 21 (4): 113–126.

18. Taganov I., Ivanov V., Nechaev A. 2007 Zagadka uzorov bulata. Kalashnikov: Oruzhiye, boyepripasy, snaryazheniye, No. 4: 87–91.

19. Verhoeven J., Pendray A. 1993 Studies of Damascus steel blades. Pt. I: Experiments on reconstructed blades. Materials Characterization, vol. 30: 175–186.

20. Verhoeven J., Pendray A., Wagstaff S. 2018 Damascus steel revisited. JOM: The Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, vol. 70 (7): 1331–1336.

21. Verhoeven J., Peterson D. 1992 What is Damascus steel? Materials Characterization, vol. 29: 335–341.

22. Wadsworth J., Sherby O. 1992 Comments on “Damascus steel, part III: The Wadsworth– Sherby mechanism” by Verhoeven et al. Materials Characterization, vol. 28: 165–172.

23. Zavyalov V.I., Engovatova A.V. 2020 Palash iz Yaroslavlya. In Arkheologiya Podmoskovya: Materialy nauch. seminara, iss. 16. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 149–154.

24. Zinyakov N.M., Savelieva T.V., Voyakin D.A. 2013 Kuznechniye i chugunniye izdeliya srednevekovogo Talkhira. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing


Review

For citations:


Zinyakov N.M. Microstructural Study of Medieval Crucible Steels from Archaeological Sites in Central and Northwest Asia: Identifying the Bulat. Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2024;52(3):82-90. https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.3.082-090

Views: 202


ISSN 1563-0110 (Print)