Preview

Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Analysis of Structural and Developmental Trends at Major Cheptsa Fortified Sites in the Western Urals (Idnakar, Uchkakar, and Guryakar)

https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2020.48.1.120-128

Full Text:

Abstract

This article outlines the findings of interdisciplinary studies at the three largest medieval fortified settlements (9th-13th centuries AD) on the middle Cheptsa River, northern Udmurtia: Soldyr I Idnakar, Kushman Uchkakar, and Gordino I Guryakar To assess the general trends and characteristic features of their structure and planning, a geophysical survey was carried out, using electrical and magnetic prospecting methods. By correlating geophysical anomalies with excavation findings, two interrelated tasks were completed: reconstructing past events on the basis of archaeological evidence, and assessing the reliability of the geophysical findings. Previously unknown defense lines were revealed at all the sites. Inner layout was virtually linear. Settlement areas (residential, household, and production) were identified. Despite external similarity, the three sites show significant differences in structural and developmental trends. Specifically, at Idnakar and Guryakar, the “annexed” territory protected by a new line of fortifications was used as a household and production periphery. At Uchkakar, this territory was used mainly for residential and household activities, whereas the household and production zone was outside the enclosure. Another distinction of Uchkakar is that the promontory did not reveal the residential, household, or production development zone traditional for Cheptsa settlements. At Guryakar, in contrast to two other sites, an in-depth fortification system was revealed, but no annexed areas.

About the Author

I. V. Zhurbin
Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Laboratory Head.

T. Baramzinoy 34, Izhevsk, 426067



References

1. Arkheologicheskaya karta severnykh raionov Udmurtii. 2004 Ivanov A.G., Ivanova M.G., Ostanina T.I., Shutova N.I. Izhevsk: UIIYAL UrO RAN.

2. Fedorina A.N., Krasnikova A.M., Mesnyankina S.V. 2008 Lokalizatsiya i issledovaniye zhilykh i khozyaistvennykh sooruzheniy na selishchakh Ves 5 i Shekshovo 2 s ispolzovaniyem geofiziki i arkheologii. In Arkheologiya Vladimiro-Suzdalskoi zemli: Materialy nauchnogo seminara, iss. 2. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 23-35.

3. Ivanova M.G. 1976 Kushmanskoye gorodishche. In Voprosy arkheologii Udmurtii. Izhevsk: Udm. NII istorii, ekonomiki, literatury i yazyka, pp. 93-106.

4. Ivanova M.G. 1982 Gorodishche Gurya-kar: Rezultaty issledovaniy 1979 g. In Srednevekovye pamyatniki basseina r Cheptsy. Izhevsk: Udm. NII pri SM UdmASSR, pp. 3-26.

5. Ivanova M.G. 1998 Idnakar: Drevneudmurtskoye gorodishche IX-XIII vv. Izhevsk: UIIYAL UrO RAN.

6. Ivanova M.G., Modin R.N. 2015 Kushmanskoye gorodishche Uchkakar X-XIII vv.: Materialy vneshnei chasti v kontekste razvitiya srednevekovykh poseleniy. In Trudy Kamskoi arkheologo-etnograficheskoi ekspeditsii, iss. 10. Perm: Perm. Gos. Ped. Univ., pp. 138-151.

7. Ivanova M.G., Zhurbin I.V. 2006 Evaluating science-based approaches in the study of the medieval Udmurt settlement Idnakar. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, vol. 26 (2): 68-79.

8. Ivanova M.G., Zhurbin I.V., Kirillov A.N. 2013 Fortifications at Idnakar settlement: The findings of interdisciplinary research. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, vol. 41 (2): 108-119.

9. Kolchin B.A. 1953 Chernaya metallurgiya i metalloobrabotka v Drevnei Rusi: (Domongolskiy period). Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR. (MIA; No. 32).

10. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya Kushmanskogo gorodishcha Uchkakar IX-XIII vv.: Metodika kompleksnogo analiza. 2018 I.V. Zhurbin, E.E. Antipina, M.G. Ivanova, E.Y. Lebedeva, R.N. Modin, A.Y. Sergeyev, L.V Yavorskaya. Moscow: TAUS.

11. Modin R.N., Zhurbin I.V., Ivanova M.G. 2018 Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya i rekonstruktsiya oboronitelnykh sooruzheniy finno-ugorskikh srednevekovykh poseleniy (Kushmanskoye gorodishche Uchkakar). Rossiyskaya arkheologiya, No. 2: 83-97.

12. Pervukhin N.G. 1896 Opyt arkheologicheskogo issledovaniya Glazovskogo uezda Vyatskoi gubernii. In Materialy po arkheologii vostochnykh guberniy Rossii, vol. 2. Moscow: [Tip. M.G. Volchaninova].

13. Skakun N.N., Tarasov V. A. 2000 Rezultaty primeneniya magnitorazvedki i kappametrii pri issledovanii seleniya tripolskoi kultury Bodaki. Arkheo-logicheskiye vesti, iss. 7: 60-69.

14. Spitsyn A.A. 1893 Priuralskiy krai: Arkheologicheskiye rozyskaniya o drevneishikh obitatelyakh Vyatskoi gubernii. In Materialy po arkheologii vostochnykh guberniy Rossii, vol. 1. Moscow: [Tip. E. Lissnera i Y. Romana].

15. Zhurbin I.V., Ivanova M.G. 2018 Geophysical studies at the Kushmanskoye (Uchkakar) fortified settlement, Kama basin. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, vol. 46 (1): 76-85.


For citation:


Zhurbin I.V. A Comparative Analysis of Structural and Developmental Trends at Major Cheptsa Fortified Sites in the Western Urals (Idnakar, Uchkakar, and Guryakar). Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2020;48(1):120-128. https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2020.48.1.120-128

Views: 41


ISSN 1563-0110 (Print)