Modeling the Deformation of Bone Points: Archaeological and Experimental Data
https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2016.44.3.087-092
Abstract
Bone and horn tools are a highly informative category of artifacts. Variously sized and shaped projectile (spear, harpoon, arrow, and dart) points spanning the periods from the Paleolithic to the recent centuries are of special importance. In this article, we review the most noteworthy directions in Western (European and North American) experimental research done in the 20th and early 21st century, outline the results of our own experiments in using bone points, and discuss parallels among Siberian and Eastern European prehistoric cultures. In our experiments with an archery bow, special attention was paid to fastening the arrowhead to the shaft and to properties of the material (bone and horn). Most experimenters believe that deformation of bone points is a reliable indicator of their artifi cial nature and of the ways they were used in hunting (projectile versus skin dressing), warfare, or ritual activities. The latter include symbolic shooting at rock drawings before hunting and at landscape features such as crevices and trees, as exemplified by a ritual practiced by Californian Native Americans.
About the Authors
A. P. Borodovsky
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Tabarev
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ancient and Modern Bone Artefacts from America to Russia: Cultural, Technological and Functional Signature. 2010 Oxford: BAR. (BAR Intern. Ser.; No. 2136).
2. Arndt S., Newcomer M. 1986 Breakage patterns on prehistoric bone points: An experimental study. In Studies in the Upper Paleolithic of Britain and Northwest Europe, D.A. Roe (ed.). Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 165–173. (BAR; vol. 296).
3. Bergman C. 1987 Hafting and use of bone and antler points from Ksar Akil, Lebanon. In La Main et l’Outil. Manches et emmanchements préhistoriques: Table Ronde C.N.R.S. tenue à Lyon du 26 au 29 novembre 1984, sous la direction de D. Stordeur. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, pp. 117–126.
4. Borodovsky A.P. 1997 Drevneye kostoreznoye delo yuga Zapadnoi Sibiri. Novosibirsk: Izd. IAE SO RAN.
5. Borodovsky A.P., Zubova A.V., Pozdnyakov D.V., Tabarev A.V., Cheremisin D.V. 2010 Arkheologiya nasiliya (interpretatsiya materialov arkheologicheskikh, antropologicheskikh i izobrazitelnykh kompleksov): Ucheb.-metod. posobiye. Novosib. Gos. Univ., Novosib. Gos. Ped. Univ., IAE SO RAN. Novosibirsk: [s.l.].
6. Bradfield J. 2012 Macrofractures on bone-tipped arrows: Analysis of hunter-gatherer arrows in the Fourie collection from Namibia. Antiquity, vol. 86: 1179–1191.
7. Bradfield J., Brand T. 2015 Results of utilitarian and accidental breakage experiments on bone points. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, vol. 7 (1): 27–38.
8. Buc N. 2011 Experimental series and use-wear in bone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 38: 546–557.
9. Chapman J. 1999 The origins of warfare in the prehistory of Central and Eastern Europe. In Ancient Warfare: Archaeological Perspectives, J. Carman, A. Harding (eds.). Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, pp. 101–142.
10. Cheshier J., Kelly R.L. 2006 Projectile point shape and durability: The effect of thickness: Length. American Antiquity, vol. 71: 353–363.
11. Derevianko A.P., Molodin V.I. 1994 Denisova peshchera. Pt. 1. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
12. Frison G.C. 1989 Experimental use of Clovis weaponry and tools on African elephants. Antiquity, vol. 54: 766–783.
13. Koni, kolesnitsy i kolesnichiye stepei Evrazii. 2010 V.S. Bochkarev, A.P. Buzhilova, A.V. Epimakhov, L.S. Klein, P.A. Kosintsev, S.V. Kullanda, P.F. Kuznetsov, E.E. Kuzmina, M.B. Mednikova, A.N. Usachuk, A.A. Khokhlov, E.A. Cherlenok, I.V. Chechushkov. Yekaterinburg, Samara, Donetsk, Chelyabinsk: Rifei.
14. Luik H. 2006 For hunting or for warfare? Bone arrowheads from the Late Bronze Age fortifi ed settlements in Eastern Baltic. Estonian Journal of Archaeology, vol. 10 (2): 132–149.
15. Tabarev A.V. 2005–2009 Delo o spryatannykh nakonechnikakh (klady-tainiki kamennykh izdeliy na territorii Severnoi Ameriki). Stratum plus, No. 1: Middle Paleolithic: In Search for Dynamics: 300–333.
16. Tyzzer E.E. 1935–1936 The “simple bone point” of the shell-heaps of the northeastern Algonkian area and its probable significance. American Antiquity, vol. 1: 261–279.
17. Waguespack N.M., Surovell T.A., Denoyer A., Dallow A., Savage A., Hyneman J., Tapster D. 2009 Making a point: Wood- versus stone-tipped projectiles. Antiquity, vol. 83: 786–800.
Review
For citations:
Borodovsky A.P., Tabarev A.V. Modeling the Deformation of Bone Points: Archaeological and Experimental Data. Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2016;44(3):87-92. https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2016.44.3.087-092
Views:
627
Email this article 